Why Do Meetings Have a Bad Reputation?
Meetings dominate the way in which we do business today.
Although many of us complain about meetings, we can all expect to
spend our careers deeply immersed in them. Most professionals
attend approximately 61 meetings per month and research indicates
that over 50 percent of this meeting time is wasted. Assuming each
of these meetings is one hour long professionals lose 31 hours per
month in unproductive meetings, or approximately four work days.
Considering these statistics, it's no surprise that meetings have
such a bad reputation.
How Are Unproductive Meetings Affecting Us?
Most professionals who meet on a regular basis admit to
daydreaming (91%), missing meetings (96%) or missing parts of
meetings (95%). A large percentage (73%) say they have brought
other work to meetings and 39% say they have dozed during meetings.
One might be tempted to snicker at these statistics… but have
you seriously considered how these inefficiencies affect you and
your organization?
Some direct effects of unproductive meetings
include:
- meetings are longer, less efficient and generate fewer
results
- more meetings are needed to accomplish objectives with so much
time spent in ineffective meeting
- employees have less time to get their own work done
- ineffective meetings create frustration at all staff
levels
- information generated in unproductive meetings usually isn't
managed properly
- inefficient meetings cost organizations billions of dollars
each year in otherwise productive employee work time.
How Did the Situation Become So Serious?
Although there is a general consensus among professionals today
that meetings could be more productive, very few seem willing to
make a commitment to improve them. There are many reasons for this
lack of commitment:
Most individuals have never experienced or witnessed the power
of a truly effective meeting and therefore, don't recognize the
importance of having better meetings for many. It may seem more
"convenient" to continue current meeting practices, regardless of
how inefficient they may be many teams don't have access to the
kind of effective meeting information they need to improve their
meetings most employees feel there's hardly enough time in a day to
complete basic tasks. Who has the time or energy to commit to
improving meetings? Managers, in general, fail to consider the
negative impact meetings have on the organization's bottom line
What's the Outlook?
Meeting frequency is actually increasing and today's
professionals are attending more and more meetings. Forty-six
percent of respondents to a recent MCI survey reported they attend
more meetings today than they did one year ago. With business
moving faster than ever, meetings are how we stay informed.
Considering the amount of time we're spending, and will continue to
spend in meetings, it's evident we need to take control of our
meetings... now.
What Can Be Done to Improve Meetings?
A. Learn and Communicate the Basics
The first step to improving meetings is to start with the
basics, which means training everyone in the organization about
effective meetings. Because meetings are such an integral part of
business, everyone in the organization should understand the
fundamentals of an effective meeting and how to achieve their goals
each and every time they meet. Giving employees access to meeting
information helps them understand the effect of unproductive
meetings on their work lives and gives them the power to improve
unproductive meeting situations.
Intel Corporation is an example of an organization that takes
its meetings very seriously. Walk into any conference room at any
Intel factory or office anywhere in the world and you will see a
poster on the wall with a series of simple questions about the
meetings that take place there: Do you know the purpose of this
meeting? Do you have an agenda? Do you know your role? Every new
employee, from the most junior production worker to the highest
ranking executive, is required to take the company's course on
effective meetings. For years, the course was taught by CEO Andy
Grove, who believed that good meetings were such an important part
of Intel's culture that it was worth his time to train all
employees. "In our training program, we talk a lot about meeting
discipline," says Michael Fors, corporate training manager at Intel
University. "It isn't complicated. It's doing the basics well:
structured agendas, clear goals, paths that you're going to follow.
These things make a huge difference."
B. Apply Effective Meeting Techniques
Once everyone in the organization understands the importance of
improving meeting effectiveness and has learned the appropriate
techniques, incentives must be created to motivate employees to
apply what they've learned. Support of management or group leaders
will also assist in the implementation and commitment to new
meeting methods. When the group as a whole is committed to
improving the situation, then a behavioral norm is created. If new
behaviors are expected and consistently reinforced over time,
individuals will attempt to achieve and follow the norms.
C. Implement Technological Tools to Make Meeting
Easier
- The emphasis on teamwork in today's workplace has created a
movement towards implementing collaborative technology in the
meeting room. This technology includes computers, LCD projectors
and interactive whiteboards. Employing these technologies will
allow meeting participants to access computer-based information,
share data and automatically save information generated during
their meetings – all functionality for enhanced group
collaboration.
- Like other areas of business, technology is helping make
meetings easier and more efficient. In many organizations today,
e-mail is being used as a quick and easy method of communicating
information internally without the need for meeting. In fact,
eighty-two percent of executives share meeting notes with
colleagues 77 percent of them by e-mail. However, even with the
help of e-mail to communicate, 45% of executives still feel
overwhelmed by the number of meetings they attend. This indicates
that technology is helping today's meeting dilemma, but not
entirely solving it.
- Many organizations are adopting videoconferencing to
communicate across distances. In 1996, manufacturers shipped
approximately 300,000 systems and in the following year nearly 1.4
million copies of videoconferencing software were loaded onto PCs
across America. Given the need for fast communication in today's
workplace, the need to communicate over distances and the increase
in the number of meetings we must attend, most organizations will
likely implement videoconferencing as a common meeting practice in
the future.
Glen Miller, the director of worldwide video and satellite
communications for Pharmacia & Upjohn, has installed
enterprise-wide videoconferencing equipment and witnessed the
benefits of this technology. "The ability to interact with others
remotely produces huge corporate benefits," says Miller. "Last
year, for example, videoconferencing slashed more than $6 million
in direct travel expenses for Pharmacia & Upjohn. It also freed
up about two thousand workdays that managers and executives used to
spend in transit. Videoconferencing has been our global
productivity tool for the '90s."
Conclusion
The need to improve our meetings is evident. Now the challenge
is to communicate, learn and commit to the techniques and
technology that will improve our meetings. A quote from George
David Kieffer's book, The Strategy of Meetings, summarizes the
impact meetings have on organizations today and how seriously
meetings should be considered now and in the future.
"I decided to talk with some of America's most successful and
respected leaders in business, labor, industry, education and
government "many of whom are viewed as masters in the art of
conducting meetings" to gain their insights into the subject. In
speaking with over fifty of those leaders, two central points
emerged. Number one, the skill to manage a meeting " to develop
ideas, to motivate people and to move people and ideas to positive
action " is perhaps the most critical asset in any career. And
number two, most professionals have had no real training in
devising and managing an effective meeting; in fact, most
professionals do not recognize the enormous impact their meetings
have on their organizations and their careers." |